成人头条

This WSU Newsline Podcast is available at

.

See the transcript below:

You鈥檙e listening to the podcast edition of the 成人头条 audio newsline. Learn more about WSU 鈥� the home of Thinkers, Doers, Movers and Shockers 鈥� on the Web at .

The recent rupture of the fuselage on a Southwest Airlines flight has raised questions about current testing models and inspections of aging aircraft. The director of the Aging Aircraft Laboratory at the National Institute for Aviation Research at 成人头条, Melinda Laubach-Hock, says it鈥檚 not easy to predict the aging process.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淭he reasons why it鈥檚 hard to predict how an aircraft ages is it鈥檚 not just calendar age, it鈥檚 also the way the aircraft was operated, the way it was maintained, the way it was inspected, the materials used to manufacture it, so there鈥檚 a large number of things that go into predicting the useful life of an airplane.鈥�

The average age of general aviation aircraft is just less than 30 years. The use of these aging aircraft is one reason that the FAA manages an Aging Airplane Program and often issues airworthiness directives, aimed at addressing specific safety concerns or unsafe conditions on specific airplane types.

Laubach-Hock explains what the Aging Aircraft Lab at 成人头条 State is looking for.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淭he aging aircraft lab looks at aircraft from a destructive perspective. When we do that we鈥檙e looking for cracks, corrosion, mechanical damage, other things that might decrease the useful life of an airframe.鈥�

In doing research, Laubach-Hock says the Aging Aircraft Lab at WSU鈥檚 National Institute for Aviation Research has not found serious safety issues.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淔or the research on the airframes that we鈥檝e done for private industry, as well as for the federal government, we鈥檝e found cracks, corrosion, some minor maintenance issues, but we really haven鈥檛 found anything that I would think would jeopardize the safety of the aircraft.鈥�

Laubach-Hock explains one of the challenges in studying aging aircraft.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淭he challenges we鈥檝e seen when we apply our research is just because we find something on one airplane doesn鈥檛 mean it鈥檚 representative of the entire fleet.鈥�

So how old is too old for an airplane? It seems like a simple question, at least to those outside of the aviation industry. At what point is a plane too old to fly safely? Unfortunately, it isn鈥檛 an easy question to answer, as many factors come into play when determining if an aircraft is still safe to fly. In addition, as parts are replaced, repairs made, and body work performed over the craft鈥檚 life, a 30-year-old plane that has been well maintained may actually be safer than a younger plane that hasn鈥檛 been treated as well.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淭heoretically, you could fly an airplane forever, but it costs time and money and there becomes a point where it鈥檚 just economically feasible to retire the airplane over continuing to use it in service.鈥�

Some might say everything but age is what really matters. To truly measure an aircraft鈥檚 age, the hours it has been used and its condition must be taken into account, as each affects the other. In addition, the materials used to construct the plane dramatically affect its useful life, as do the conditions under which it has been flown and the maintenance it has received. In any event, Laubach-Hock says, in spite of some high-profile incidents, flying is safe.

Laubach-Hock: 鈥淭he main thing I want to reiterate is that flying is safe, even with aging aircraft. We see high-profile issues, but we don鈥檛 see them very frequently.鈥�

Thanks for listening. Until next time, this is Joe Kleinsasser for 成人头条.